在 OpenClaw 和 Lindy 之间为消息驱动型工作流做出选择
我正试图决定在我的项目中实现消息驱动型工作流时，应选用 OpenClaw 还是 Lindy。两者看起来都很有前景，但我想了解哪一款在性能上更优，或更适用于此类架构。如有任何见解、实践经验或基准测试结果，将不胜感激！
Eli Webster
March 28, 2026 at 07:18 PM
我正试图决定在我的项目中实现消息驱动型工作流时，应选用 OpenClaw 还是 Lindy。两者看起来都很有前景，但我想了解哪一款在性能上更优，或更适用于此类架构。如有任何见解、实践经验或基准测试结果，将不胜感激！
添加评论
评论 (6)
I've used OpenClaw in a couple of projects. It's quite robust and has good support for asynchronous message processing. The learning curve is a bit steep but worth it.
I evaluated both recently. If you prioritize performance and reliability, OpenClaw tends to outperform Lindy, especially in complex workflows.
In my experience, OpenClaw integrates better with existing message brokers and has a richer ecosystem. Lindy is newer and improving but may not have the same level of community support yet.
Keep in mind that Lindy has a more permissive license, which might be a factor depending on your project constraints.
For simpler projects, Lindy might be easier to implement and maintain. But for enterprise-level solutions, OpenClaw is probably the way to go.
Lindy is more lightweight compared to OpenClaw, which can be a plus if you want something less complex. However, it might lack some advanced features you get in OpenClaw.